- Startup Obituary
- Posts
- Startup Obituary : Taskwer
Startup Obituary : Taskwer
A platform built with empathy—but empathy alone doesn’t guarantee scale
Ram Gangisetty
April 25, 2025
💡 The Vision
Chris, a solo founder and self-taught builder, launched Taskwer with one simple but powerful idea: help people earn money with dignity during financial hardship—not by asking for handouts, but by offering real services to their community.
It was a heartfelt hybrid. Think TaskRabbit meets GoFundMe—but instead of donations, users offered their time and talents. Mow lawns. Babysit. Fix phones. Paint murals. The goal? Empower those struggling financially to work their way through tough times, with help from neighbors and friends.
🗣️ “I wanted to build something that helped people help themselves,” Chris wrote.
🧠 “When something is important enough, you do it even if the odds are not in your favor.”
He spent a full year building the platform himself.
🛠️ The Build
Chris didn’t just code a website. He built an experience designed to be personal, flexible, and friction-free for people in need of income.
Here’s how Taskwer worked:
🎯 Campaign Goals:
Users could create service-based campaigns and set a financial target—like raising $2,000 through babysitting or tutoring. It wasn’t a random listing. It was a goal-driven profile, giving people purpose and urgency.
💬 Messaging System:
A built-in chat allowed users and supporters to connect directly. Think less “gig platform” and more neighborhood conversation—you could ask questions, offer custom jobs, or just coordinate timing.
📊 User Dashboard:
Every user got a dashboard to track progress, manage orders, and handle logistics. It felt more like running your own small hustle than being a faceless freelancer on a marketplace.
💵 Cash-Friendly Payments:
Chris intentionally built it to support cash payments. No Stripe fees. No platform cuts. Just real money in your hands, fast.
🫂 Trust Through Sharing:
There were no public reviews or rating systems. Instead, users shared their campaign links via personal networks—on Facebook, via text, in church groups. The trust came from who you were, not how many stars you had.
💡 “If you can’t get 100 people to love your product, don’t try to get a million.”
It was intimate. Human. Real. But real doesn’t always scale.
🧱 The Roadblocks
Despite the heart behind it, Taskwer struggled to break out.
1. Shame Is Real
Users hesitated to share their campaigns. Even though it was work—not donations—there was still stigma around asking for help.
But when people are uncomfortable promoting themselves, growth stalls.
2. The Competition Was Everywhere
Platforms like Fiverr, TaskRabbit, and Craigslist already owned the space. Taskwer’s advantage—empathy—wasn’t enough to tear users away from what they knew.
The trust-through-sharing model meant campaigns only reached as far as your friends list. There was no built-in engine for network effects—and that was deadly for a marketplace.
4. A Solo Mission
Chris did it all. Code. Design. UX. Customer support. Marketing. It’s a heroic effort—but heroism doesn’t scale.
⚠️ “You can have a great product, but if you don’t have distribution, you don’t have a business.”
💥 The Shutdown
After a year of building and a few months post-launch, the reality was clear: there wasn’t enough usage to keep going. Chris shut it down and wrote an honest, reflective post on what went wrong.
💬 “I didn’t fail because I didn’t build the product. I failed because I didn’t find users.”
🧠 Lessons for Founders
Talk to users before you build. Chris poured 12 months into code—before true market validation.
Solve pain, not just problems. Taskwer was noble—but if the user pain isn’t immediate or visceral, they won’t act.
Build marketing into the product. Viral loops, referrals, SEO—growth has to be designed, not hoped for.
Don’t solo something that needs scale. Marketplaces are a team sport. One person can’t build demand and supply alone.
🔍 “Startups don’t starve, they drown—in ideas, distractions, and tasks. Stay narrow.”
Taskwer Scorecard
Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Product-Market Fit | 2/5 | The emotional appeal was strong, but the shame/stigma friction made user activation difficult. |
USP | 4/5 | A heartfelt twist on gig work—goal-driven campaigns + personal networks. Clear, distinct positioning. |
Timing | 3/5 | Launched during a cultural moment where mutual aid was rising, but lacked the distribution muscle to ride it. |
Founder Fit | 4/5 | Chris was deeply aligned with the mission—empathetic, hands-on, and committed. |
Team (Execution) | 2/5 | As a solo founder, Chris did everything—from code to support. Admirable, but a heavy lift for a marketplace. |
🕯️ Final Words
Taskwer didn’t fail because it lacked heart. It failed because the emotional nuance it was built on—shame, pride, privacy—is hard to scale.
But what Chris did matters. He shipped. He learned. He shared.
Some startups win with numbers. Others win with humanity.
Taskwer tried to win with both—and there’s something beautiful about that.
🔗 Original post by Chris: How I Spent a Year Building an App and Failed
Thansk Chris for sharing this story with Startup Obituary community.
I hope this Taskwer’s journey highlights the need for quick product market fit. If this story helped you in anyway can you please forward to at least one person that needs to hear this?
Cheers,
Ram
👉 My simple ask: It took hours to put together this post for you. I hope you forward this email to at least one founder friend or share on your social channels 🙏.
Startup Obituary is for educational purpose only not a business advice.
Reply